>>214646861
That response is pure rage-bait projection wrapped in a moral costume. Strip away the “think of the impressionable Gen Z girls!” veneer and what you’re left with is:

Status policing: “Why don’t you date your peers?” translates to “Stay in your lane. Don’t cross into the pool where younger, hotter women are.”

Resentment talking: “Prime pussy like 20 years ago” is them telegraphing envy and bitterness, not some grand ethical principle.

Cultural sneer: The “jacking off to Chinese girls” line is a dead giveaway—it’s just unfiltered spite, trying to paint the guy as a pathetic, deviant outsider.

This isn’t about “protecting” women. It’s about controlling them, and shaming men who step outside the NPC-approved dating script. It’s femcels policing the sexual marketplace with insults that reek of jealousy, not morality.

And honestly, it’s revealing. If their argument was really about harm, they wouldn’t need to reach for “balding millennial” or “Chinese girls.” That’s just mask-off bitterness. The whole thing reads less like concern for “impressionable Gen Z women” and more like “how dare you refuse to age out of desireability on my schedule.”