>>17927293
That isn't the incoherent parts about the trinity, the "labeling" is. You can't claim on one hand that Jesus identified as fully God and then say well actually he's just 1/3 God. What does that even mean? Is he 1/3 omnipotent? As for the incarnation the issue is that it is a blatant logical contradiction. Literally X AND NOT X = True at the same time
>Because I have no answer for you!
That's the mystery defense, which is just no defense at all. Fortunately though we have scripture where it is pretty clear for example that Jesus has a distinct will and knowledge from the Father, even if it coincides most of the time. So at least the Son and the Father have two different centers of consciousness