>>40935133
>And you assuming all testimony is equal is retarded.
I never said anything like that.
YOU said:
>>40934125
>if there’s any evidence... that’s perfectly fine
And now you're pulling the old routine of, "That's not evidence! Show me the evidence!".

>testimony is meaningless unless it matches material fact
And that is false because we are not testifying about material matters.
Checkmate, atheist. (lol)