>>518849802
>Maybe you right, and India would 100% win. China’s new drones, jets and armoured vehicles stands no chance against Indias great armed forces
You should be ashamed of this bullshit strawmanning but its par for the course in pol and thats why I say that pol's epistemology about India is as unreliable as Reddit's epistemology about Russia. You won't be able to quote me saying that India would 100% win in some fictional videogame type no-nukes war against China because I never said that. Here, I'll repeat it for you:
>>518849477
>If China went mad and for some idiotic reason attacked India and in this videogame world if nukes didn't exist then by all means the West would be salivating at the chance to knock China out. And if our backs were to the wall? If Russia has struggled this much with Ukraine, we might well have a fight on our hands.
So no, I never said we would 100% win. But using picrel out of context to represent the military capability of India is as sound as Reddit taking one muddy photo of Russian-city-during-spring-thaw as representative of Russia.