>>720656541
>It would just give corporations more control as they muscle out smaller developers.
Already happens unfortunately.
Nintendo and other companies will file for patents, trademarks, and copyright in order to quash developers if they get to big while smaller developers don't have the funds or connections to assemble a legal counsel to defend themselves, let alone defend their own "Intellectual property".
It's a one-sided system that only protects people who can lobby the government for more arcane laws to inflate legal fees.
>That has absolutely nothing to do with skg
It has much to do with it, because when we talk about video games, most are "licensed" or you're buying a license to own a license to own the game. There's a lot of legal webs in place, and the reason you never see them tested is because if you sorted everything out, then it would start the question: "what are you buying when you purchase a video game?" which naturally leads into questions regarding intellectual property.
Even if you don't think so, these companies, who lobby the government for unfair advantages, do and will fight tooth-n-nail to stop the topic from being broached.
>>720657078
Your absolutely right, but what I'm saying here is that the government already has their hand in the video game industry, so SKG is not some new 'invitation' for the EU to give themselves more power, because they already have that ability.