>>64409886
i think because the idea that they're a generation ahead in fighter aircraft is more appealing than the idea that they're trying to replicate a strike concept we retired some time ago without clear replacement. it's a capability we believed wasn't necessary, and might not be with what other tools we have, but may be required for their possible aims regarding taiwan and india. it's a concept that has it's place, i don't believe that it's place is attempting to intercept other aircraft however, instead i believe it exists to provide similar SEAD/DEAD and deep strike capability. it actually may be one of their better projects if it is intended to be a temu F-117, as it will give them good experience and industry in development of their own stealth craft, and would make sense given their local aims and opponents. if it's meant to be an intercept craft like this seemingly unofficial patch would claim, it would reveal an interesting paranoia, one that i don't think is particularly founded at this time.