>>4476771
Hahahahaha

>>4476813
Pick one of these.
>"color science" is not real. raw files do not contain color. only lenses really matter. anyone can get the colors they want by making a preset out of an edit. if you can't figure this out, spending thousands on full frame mirrorless might not be for you.
OR
>actually, canon and nikon color are shit for colorblind rockwell tier boomers. sony and fujifilm have the best color.
I recommend you pick #2 and become a raving fuji fanboy and just ignore sony, because otherwise you will have to admit sony is good (two out of five mirrorless cameras sold are sony, one out of two for full frame). /p/'s userbase is heading towards the single digits and the chances of you convincing anyone not to buy a sony is dropping to zero. The last guy to try to shill against sony here convinced 3 or 4 people to buy a sony and then leave because he was too retarded.

Most people like you (you're all the same, very NPC like) already switched to being fuji fanboys. They realized they were losing at the facts game, and didn't really have the photo game at all, so they went with fuji for the feels game and gained the ability to pretend to be a photographer without taking photos (other than of their camera). Take this advice or leave it, but if you follow it you might actually get somewhere with your autistic brand crusade and convince a grand total of 2 autistic zach-tier retards to buy an xm5.