>>7711468
I'm not going to pretend to be some art god, but he's mostly correct. Kind of. At least for low level fundies stuff like most people are concerned with here. Either you know how to draw a box, or you don't. You know your anatomy, or you don't. You don't need someone to list off all your mistakes, your mistakes are obvious if your honest with yourself, and that's not really what critique is for. You should be able to tell if you can't draw a box. Critique is for interrogating subjective qualities like themes and the effectiveness of your artistic decisions. It's not whether or not you drew a thing correctly, it's whether or not /how/ you drew the thing says what you wanted your art to say.

That isn't to say you can't ask for help with a particular subject. But it needs to be stressed that guidance is not critique. You need to know exactly what you want to work on and ask particular questions so you get particular answers. Because if you ask people for a general 'critique' on beginner work, you're just going to get a vague copypasta that says you did everything wrong, because in all likelyhood you probably did. Teachers can only grade homework if they know what the curriculum is.