>>513108361
>>513109556
What Dani Sulikowski calls low status women in her theory, is simply any woman who is not high genetic status European.

So you have European women, with resources and time (remember they are not having more children) trying to recover their genetic advantage. How do they this? They use manipulative sexual suppression. The aim is to force those around them to have fewer children.
They denigrate motherhood. They claim motherhood is oppressive and women should get out and work. They must vote. Women need to take part in the way society is run. The way the world is run. They want all the third world genetic trash to believe this too. Because it sounds wonderful. Its an equality statement that very easily resonates. But its shallow and superficial.

Its not necessarily a conscious decision by women. The social environment of women is critically important to them. You cant be a woman today and deny feminism. And survive. Women have incredibly strong motives to signal their allegiance to a group.

Women are the rate limiting breeders in any succesful race, its not men. Men are not valuable, yes they can build things and make womens' life easier but as long as there are women giving birth to more smart men, the races future is assured. So its actually women who are responsible for building and maintaining that race. If you take this very valuable reproductive capacity and make them play the role that un-valuable men used to do, then you are removing that reproductive capacity for that race and it will eventually disappear.

Men will find anything with a pussy, legs and tits and not too fat, fuckable. And low genetic status women will want white partners. For the same evolutionary reasons that european women of high genetic value want to exclude them from breeding.

The natural order forces them to do this.

There is an additional complication of usury and capitalism that compounds this. But lets leave that for another day.