>>519425845
>no chubby redhead gf
Why do you torture me?
4chan Search
3 results for "914c98059eb6feeaeaa16615b080f2b5"
I blew air into my wife’s asshole she farted it out and some pooplet particles came with it.
It doesn’t really matter because the distance between peak female and nadir female is exponentially smaller than the distance between peak male and nadir male.
Simps will find any woman attractive.
The majority of men will find the majority of women attractive.
Men actually do fall in love, men can fall in love with an unattractive woman and love her as if she were an angel.
The reverse is either untrue to so rare it is statistically invisible.
The majority of women do not find the majority of men attractive.
Women find specific and particular features attractive, such features are concentrated in the elite element of males.
Men find the female form itself attractive, an abstraction of a female is attractive to men. You can take an entirely androgynous mannequin and add breasts, eyelashes, long hair, and men will gush over it. Men find the idea of a woman attractive, this gives women way more leeway on how they can look and still appear attractive.
Slapping a penis on a mannequin only elicits disgust.
Women being so particular it means only a very small group of men who fit those particulars will appear attractive.
Why is it skewed against us?
Well women were selectively bred by men, men were selectively bred by nature (war, predators, catastrophe) while women were insulated from such things.
Men refined women to be perfect mates for men.
Nature refined men to be perfect survivors in nature, not to be perfect mates for women.
This is why the overlap between what men are and what women want is extremely small compared to the overlap between what men want and what women are which is a huge overlap.
For men it really is luck of the draw.
For women you already won the dating game being born a woman.
Simps will find any woman attractive.
The majority of men will find the majority of women attractive.
Men actually do fall in love, men can fall in love with an unattractive woman and love her as if she were an angel.
The reverse is either untrue to so rare it is statistically invisible.
The majority of women do not find the majority of men attractive.
Women find specific and particular features attractive, such features are concentrated in the elite element of males.
Men find the female form itself attractive, an abstraction of a female is attractive to men. You can take an entirely androgynous mannequin and add breasts, eyelashes, long hair, and men will gush over it. Men find the idea of a woman attractive, this gives women way more leeway on how they can look and still appear attractive.
Slapping a penis on a mannequin only elicits disgust.
Women being so particular it means only a very small group of men who fit those particulars will appear attractive.
Why is it skewed against us?
Well women were selectively bred by men, men were selectively bred by nature (war, predators, catastrophe) while women were insulated from such things.
Men refined women to be perfect mates for men.
Nature refined men to be perfect survivors in nature, not to be perfect mates for women.
This is why the overlap between what men are and what women want is extremely small compared to the overlap between what men want and what women are which is a huge overlap.
For men it really is luck of the draw.
For women you already won the dating game being born a woman.