>>282072405
A lot of chink kits are tight as fuck. The one I posted was pretty tight overall and I didn't have much fun building it. But to be fair I'd rather have tight fits than loose ones, faster to fix

>>282072421
Majority of chink originals are spiky and/or overdetailed. A recent one that's not chink looking is pic related. I like the SNAA ones, they're nice if you enjoy the aesthetic