>>9516
>We have precedent for handcam streams, cleavage overlayed on top of a model (kson), and almost full body cams without face visible
There's nothing in the rules about any of it. If a vtuber does a stream it just has to be in their capacity as a vtuber, the format of the stream matters very little. So it's not handcams or BIG BADOONKERS CAM streams that are allowed, it's all vtuber streams and content. If they're full blown 3DPD streaming that has nothing to do with vtubers, similar to how flesh streamers aren't allowed to be discussed on /vt/. Content creator and vtuber shouldn't be conflated since someone who vtubes could still make videos or streams that have nothing to do with vtubing, and them being vtubers shouldn't allow that content to be discussed on /vt/ similar to how eceleb discussion isn't allowed outside of random boards.

Another thing that is important to mention is that a vtuber also being/having been another vtuber is not off-topic since they're vtubers (the topic of the board) and it has nothing to do with IRL shit (it's vtubers, not real people shit about the voice actor behind the model and her relationships, physical apperance or personal life). A VA's unrelated work outside of their capacity as a vtuber is not the same thing as their previous vtuber incarnation or some sort of alt vtuber account they also stream under. Equating the two makes no sense and has caused a lot of cognitive dissonance in regards to what gets removed from the board and how users perceive the rules from it.