>>16740357
>>16742335
>>16738819
You pretend like a tiny blob in an image from a telescope will change your mind, while you completely ignore that the site has been independently images by multiple orbiters from many nations.

The VLT working at the diffraction limit in the infrared can only resolve about 100 meters on the Lunar surface. At best you might see one slightly dark pixel from the shadow of the lander, but you would have to take it entirely on faith that it was the lander and not some other thing on the surface. Whereas the pictures from India's Chandrayaan-2 are unmistakable.