>>64174494
>Electronic guns that can be programmed to be full auto surely is a workaround for...
ATF has written opinion letters stating that you'll get raped in prison if you tried and we still have to pretend they have the ability to legislate. In short the answer to all your questions is the government is gay and draconian and it's stymied any granual progress beyond firearm designs that existed a century ago. That Glock brand Glock at its heart is a browning tilt barrel action, everything else about it is cosmetic and manufacturing changes on a technology over 120 years old.

Remington made an electronic ignition rifle almost 30 years ago. It was a bolt action to avoid all the cool things everyone could speculate about the technology because that would be illegal.
>It did poorly

Related are things like IRL aimbot and auto aiming guns which on paper are a common C+ Arduino project for a summer coding camp/shitty engineering school thesis but due to aforementioned "everything is gay and retarded" you have anti booby trap laws, indiscriminate weapon conventions, etc. to contend with which is why a gun that shoots everything in front of it is only officially used on the North Korean border. To the point the whole idea has been leapfrogged by tech into the disposable wire guided Alibaba package drone+mortar shell combo "legally" used for anti personnel in the great slavnigger trench war of 2014-2016/2020-2024+