>>4452380
Are you conscious of what you write, in context with what you have accomplished?
https://archive.palanq.win/p/search/tripcode/%21CiNE%2FYT%2Fe6/filter/text/
Most of what you post is just memes or stolen from other people

This is the only original photo you have posted in the past 12 months. You don't know a thing about composition or art. You just make shit up because you're a typical NPC pretender attracted to art because the vague terminology necessitated by english's vocabularic insufficiency makes it easier to thoughtlessly bullshit and fit in. Look, people would rather take advice from retards like the corgi-husky-doghair gearfag complex lol

Let's break it down
>If you have to use rules for composition then you're kinda fucked
All conscious and intuitive composition follows rulesets
>(unless going for a specific style)
So using rules is bad but it's also not bad? Every photo is going for a specific style.
>However if you think composition doesn't matter you're even more fucked
>unless you happen to compose unconsciously and have deluded yourself into thinking it doesn't matter
This word salad says literally nothing. Kamala-tier. Biden-tier. Trump-tier. Senile babble.
>A lot of people just throw shit at the wall to see if it sticks, and most of it doesn't
Filler statement, senile babble.
>When I say I care about composition I mean I visualize what I want there.
You are unable to prove you do this. Someone who only orders doordash can claim that they pre-taste food in their head and they're an artistic chef, can't they?
>If you do cinema or one of the more artistic types of still photography (editorial fashion, tableaux, well pondered landscape, etc)
Man who has never made anything resembling art or even journalism attempts to define art to mean only things he likes
>then it's more obvious. To compose is to arrange.
Another non-statement. Bidentrumpharris tier senile babble. You are dumber than a politician.