I'm Polish... this is wrong.
Poles and anglos shouldn't be alive by 1947
Unfortunately DDR (Deutsches Drittes Reich) died in 1945
Of course all parties involved in passing the law we're slavemasons serving the jewry for small amount of power in exchange.
Mosley should've been named an agent of the Reich, and started an uprising against the government before war with The British Empire begins.
4chan Search
5 results for "964a668f3e2ff705a1b2464d01719e4b"
>>214907538
The same way weebs look at thing (Japan) is the same way I look at anything like Mykonos or similar places in the Mediterranean. It is insane to me such a beautiful place could exist. Meanwhile the outside of my window is a parking lot and if I drive for 30 minutes il still be surrounded by packed parking lots. I'd like to move, im a licensed electrician, sometimes I imagine getting on a boat and using my skills away somewhere that's pretty.
The same way weebs look at thing (Japan) is the same way I look at anything like Mykonos or similar places in the Mediterranean. It is insane to me such a beautiful place could exist. Meanwhile the outside of my window is a parking lot and if I drive for 30 minutes il still be surrounded by packed parking lots. I'd like to move, im a licensed electrician, sometimes I imagine getting on a boat and using my skills away somewhere that's pretty.
>le the
leave the pot
so I can forget it all
leave the pot
so I can forget it all
החלטתי להתיוון
>>81535398
How much information are you getting here OP?
So the primary source would be like the governments actual plan. Like orders being handed to pilots to go bomb some place or guard some place. Secondary source would be the body of the Financial Times article. That would discuss what the orders are and the greater context of what is happening, but not by someone who is involved (the journalist isn't taking nor giving orders). The third level of abstraction would be the headline. The journalist doesn't write the headline, the Editor does, and it's meant to act as a summary for the thousands of words contained in the article. The fourth layer of abstraction is people on Twitter responding to the FT headline who didn't read the article. And the fifth layer of abstraction is us discussing people on twitter discussing the headline to an FT article none of us read.
I just have a simple question for you OP
What the fuck were you thinking?
How much information are you getting here OP?
So the primary source would be like the governments actual plan. Like orders being handed to pilots to go bomb some place or guard some place. Secondary source would be the body of the Financial Times article. That would discuss what the orders are and the greater context of what is happening, but not by someone who is involved (the journalist isn't taking nor giving orders). The third level of abstraction would be the headline. The journalist doesn't write the headline, the Editor does, and it's meant to act as a summary for the thousands of words contained in the article. The fourth layer of abstraction is people on Twitter responding to the FT headline who didn't read the article. And the fifth layer of abstraction is us discussing people on twitter discussing the headline to an FT article none of us read.
I just have a simple question for you OP
What the fuck were you thinking?