>>513777062
because you said mass deportations isn't ethnic cleansing despite it being definitionally included.
I made that very clear, are you now allowed to click the picrels?
>>513777134
>if all pedos in govt go down I will love it.
then you would have supported it before you thought it would hurt trump nigger.
>question is will you still love it if trump is implicated?
if Trump was implicated we'd storm the whitehouse and roast him on a spit.
Stop getting your worldview from shitty leftist memes.
>will it only be legitimate if blues are implicated?
MAGA isn't republican you fucking retard, it obviously includes tons of republicans and we're very happy to destroy them.
> will you consider it fake news if trump is implicated?
how do you not get it?
we have EVERYTHING nigger.
we know Trump isn't implicated.
Because he's the one that literally ended it.