>>24697616

>>24697664
>can we ever call anything "necessary" when talking about an all-powerful being?

>>24698079
>If he truly cant do that, and evil needs to exist for the world to function, then he is not all-powerful and because he stated he is all-powerful and knowingly lied, he is not all-good.

Atheist here!
The problem of evil was always bullshit to me.
It is literally pointless trash.
>all powerful , all knowing and all good
Like full stop, who are you even debating?
Because if it is an abrahamic god we have god literally torturing humans for fun because his best friend satan made this one whack bet with god (all of JOBE).
God being unable to do shot loads of things like stop iron chariots etc.

Like I know Christians have terminal superman syndrome where they inflate their god to be even more powerful ever decade until he is paradoxical however this violates the Bible they are worshiping.

As for debating a theoretical god I remove the all powerful part and we are finished I mean seriously inflating power to the point it becomes paradoxical is the problem here. Even C. S. Lewis in narnia understood this and this is why he introduced the concept of "deeper magic" who overwrites and rules the deities of narnia. If narnia is a christian allegory then it argues for this.

I know christians will have meltdowns because they worship paradoxical superman on steroids however realistically speaking this is not a valid criticism of anything.

In a realistic perspective lets take homelander, homelander is not all powerful however humans can not stop him. Will you do whatever homelander says or her lasers you?
Or will you go
>Awchually muh epicurean paradox
>you are not all powerful because...
And get lasered in the face? Like seriously who cares if home lander can not split the universe in half? If all of humanity and nukes can not stop him then what is your problem fagot?

1/3