>>40718872
>The thing is that giving birth is free and most people are poor. One baby incubated in artificial womb will cost enough that while gathering resources for that, poor people have made 10 kids to help them in their daily lives. You would need to abolish poverty if you want women to fully change into artificial wombs.
post-scarcity will happen before or at the same exact time cosmetic surgery becomes advanced
>If gene therapy in future can make women look like fresh teens for their whole life, there is no will be no end to female sexual domination.
no, because women are dumber and weaker than men, and literally rely on their looks to survive. please relearn your history. women were third class citizens until the 1960's. everyone would be with their own sex if they could. if "personality" was all that mattered people would be gay. behavior difference naturally causes people to... not like the other's behavior.
>it has nothing to do with them getting pregant.
youre misunderstanding everything. females look attractive because it has to do with them getting pregnant. otherwise men would completely ignore them. the singular make X chromosome literally ensures enough genetic variability to always have the upper hand against females. post-scarcity and cosmetic enhancement will be invented long before it can be modified.