>>514015261
After HIV infection, humans become very ill with flu-like symptoms for about a week, then the virus goes dormant in the body slowly destroying the immune system. Ten years later the infection becoems AIDS. Six years is barely half way through the cycle based on an HIV like disease.
>>514018883
>>514019431
>>514016373
Yes. Just like HIV, which is an RNA virus that multiplies by a method called reverse transcriptase. The two frontline forms of antivirals for HIV are called Nucleoside and Non-Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors (NRTIs and NNRTIs). Big pharma said that this mRNA jab cannot and would not multiply by method of reverse transcriptase but it will eventually be revealed that actually it does. There's no doubt in my mind: if you got the mRNA covid vaccine you basically asked someone to intentionally infect you with an RNA virus that is reverse transcriptasing itself and altering your DNA. You asked them to give you some synthetic form of HIV. The multiple doses was to ensure that even if the body successfully fought off the first innoculation, basically everyone would succumb to infection with the second or third innoculation. If you don't believe me, here's an excerpt straight from wikipedia.
>Retrovirus can be single-stranded RNA (just as many SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are single-stranded RNA) which enters the cell nucleus and uses reverse transcriptase to make DNA from the RNA in the cell nucleus. A retrovirus has mechanisms to be imported into the nucleus, but other mRNA (such as the vaccine) lack these mechanisms. Once inside the nucleus, creation of DNA from RNA cannot occur without a reverse transcriptase and appropriate primers, which both accompany a retrovirus, but which would not be present for other exogenous mRNA (such as a vaccine) even if it could enter the nucleus.[96]
Yeah, just trust them. It totally can't do that horrible thing.