>>513033196
>>513033196
There can only be so many reasons that exemplify the nature of humanity living at the same time, this is because humans have a fixed set of conditions and needs to be met.
The point of reference here is not that you're generalizing a specific sub-set of stereotypes but that there are no points of reference in which you can see people who defied the nature of what you're observing by describing that point of origin.
Politicians do not exist to exemplify the way that some people worked together to distribute corruption in a way that is invisible and statistics are not there to describe a blanket way that the world is always underneath some consistencies that seem to lead to an inevitable conclusion.
You get a point for being willing to side with order, but you lose literally every single point you would've gained by being unwilling to describe a side where victory took place as a component of humanity.