>>24851959
Ok, well I don't think you've presented a coherent kind of philosophical theism distinct from religion. You're saying things are what are knowable, not god, who (which?) can only be thought about as a concept. This seems alien to Plato or Aristotle and akin to heretical christian apophaticism, but you don't like revelation or religion.
This is why I have a problem with "classical theism" discourse. It leads to being unclear about your own commitments by hoping that everyone can mean the same things by being vague about some supposed neutral baseline everyone can build on, when really it's mostly used by christians who smuggle their doctrines into the "neutral" "classical" arguments. I think there is something to be gained from christian and other traditions but you can end up trying to defend or reconcile things you don't even actually believe and neglecting more natural or fruitful lines of inquiry as "particular" or "religious" rather than "neutral" or "classical". Pagan Greeks and christians and Jews all being "monotheists" is one of these distortions.

>>24851849
Co-signed