>>514696782
>it's a british missile, not hoholian. The story is obviously entirely made up its easy to tell.
Yeah, I mentioned it in the previous post.
What's baffling to me is that it is such a simple design that they should have been able to make it themselves.

Other than the turbofan engine, the FP-5 is a 1930s design... and they still need the British to design it for them.

>Hoholian missile is sapsan but its also designed by NATO.
I wouldn't be surprised.
They seem to have changed the name again as well.
In principle, it is an improvement of the Tochka.
Something that Ukraine should be able to do themselves... but so was the Flamingo.
I seems that every time the veil is lifted just a little with anything Ukrainian, there is only lies and disappointment.

Why is it that the rebels in the east can be so innovative and make useful weapons, but the rest of Ukraine can barely change the stickers on weapon systems given to them?

>>514696889
>I wonder if West will give up trying to produce missiles in Ukraine and just send them Taurus.
It will probably be "made in Ukraine", as in wings mounted and accidentally painted in some retard color with a "made in Ukraine"-sticker added.

>Also there was Solid Fuel processing plant also destroyed.
At some point they shouldn't be able to take any more Ls.
But it seems to be a part of the Ukrainian culture.

Some Russian posted a joke about a Russian and Ukrainian being taken by cannibals.
To get out alive they had to eat a bucket of shit or be railed in the ass by the tribe.
The Russian says "i'll eat the shit", does it and is freed.
The Ukrainian says he will eat the shit, but half way through he feels sick and asks to be fucked instead.
After half the tribe has fucked him, he can't take it anymore and asks to finish the bucket instead.
When he is freed he (ofc) resents the Russian for getting off easy.