>>513175893
IIRC the stats are actually saying it's just delaying the age at first coitus. Half of 30 year old men are virgins though? No, it's just 20 year old men who are nearly half virgins now.

>>513177283
It tracks with lack of marriages, yes. The problem is that people's standards, especially women's standards, have just gotten too ridiculous. Guys' standards aren't keeping up in terms of the decreasing quality of women (rising obesity etc.) but women's standards are just absurd and unnatural now. The average zoomer woman will only settle for a partner who is at least 8 inches taller than average, with a penis more than 60% longer than average, and with an income over some arbitrarily very high point now with inflation (at one point six figures, now more like $140K), and they often have some other special snowflake requirements so if you meet up just walking around at a party or a convention you aren't eligible for a date at all, thus only if you meet through friends (who are increasingly "guarding" prospective backup partners and refusing to introduce them to others) you may be eligible for a date but not otherwise. Any avenue by which you would usually seek a date is now the realm of uggos--clubs, speeddating, whatever used to be good for a date is now useless. All the hot girls can easily find a fuckbuddy who meets her requirements on tinder, and they're more than willing to share men now. Over 40% of zoomer girls are in polygynous fuckbuddy relationships now.

>>511104708
Overall, negative, but it depends really. A lot of boomers still say Franco was a bad dude. You've got a new generation that says "F that" but ironically, the French Revolution was one where even the boomers were more redpilled and youth have kinda forgotten about how it was horrid.

The voices who were always very adamant about telling us "This wasn't a good revolution!" were people like Glenn Beck and Ann Coulter, whose reputations have declined. Schools tend to say it was a very controversial war for the early American republic not because it was a bad revolution ideologically, but because it was about a conflict between republican ideals and the fact we were allied to the French kingdom. In history, America recognized France and refused to come to their aid precisely because they had gone too far ideologically, imprisoning many American revolutionaries including Lafayette and Paine and causing great hardships for religious people, so horrible in fact that when the US acquired Louisiana, Catholic clergy fully expected martyrdom and were shocked that they wouldn't be forced to die. The French Revolution was so brutal that they even asked for a statement about which religion America forces on its people, not knowing this was not an element of American republicanism after the French Republic forced repeated unusual religions made up by its political leadership on the people, such as the "Cult of Reason" and "Cult of the Supreme Being."