>>82969932
literally sticking to the topic at hand

if you cant follow analogies or understand how multiple things can be used to support an argument i think you might need to go back to roald dahl

if youre just not interested in what im talking about thats fine but if thats the case idk why you would talk to me so much lol

>>58505313
>wAlL oF tExT
you are here

reading is fun! try bunnicula.