>>16813543
>Yet another electromagnetic wall outlet device out there "proving" particle quackery along with the halbach arrays at CERN "proving" the existence of other "2 fundamental forces".
Isn't it funny how no matter what delusion a quantum retard peddles it's always backed up by good ol' archaic hertzian waveforms? Why is that? Why do they always use this one fundamental force in an effort to make some grand unified theory proving/ figuring out how the other 3 potentially exist? The irony is more layered than the very field lines they keep finding names for. How many "particles" are we up to now by the way? 56? 57? How many more will it take?
Why you brought this up and what it has to do with Feynman's thought experiment I still don't understand. Are the silver atoms used in it somehow analogous to the imaginary "photon particles" of which you still have no empirical evidence of? Well whatever, I'm sure it's extremely useful for making yet another tokamak knowing full well it won't work like the last one.

>"Rare earth minerals"
>absolutely no material in neodymium is considered "rare"

And then they pay CERN scientists to use them all and STILL not answer how the fuck they actually work. They waste them all on tokamak after tokamak knowing full well each on will fail. Maybe they are becoming rare at the rate the stupid faggots waste them?

>>507291459
>light in a vacuum (somehow)
>space is a vacuum (somehow)
>space is (*describes everything else that actually has the properties filling space and comes up with a milliopn words for "undefined").
It's as real as a shadow you retard, why do you think physicist's chase them like gophers?

>>22822699
>light in a vacuum (somehow)
>space is a vacuum (somehow)
>space is (*describes everything else that actually has the properties filling space and comes up with a milliopn words for "undefined").
It's as real as a shadow you retard, why do you think physicist's chase them like gophers?