>>941357078
>a loli is a lolita
No, that's not how it's defined. "Lolis" are defined as childlike in physique, and "lolitas" are defined as "precociously seductive young girls" (I'm unsure of the exact age range, but since Dolores ("Lolita"), from "Lolita" (a book by Vladimir Nabokov), was 12, I assume that this is how "young girl" is being used). If "moe" = "cute," and "cute" = the various traits of small limbs, large craniums (relative to entire head size), large eyes (relative to entire head size), etc., and lolis are moe, and these features are childlike, then lolis must also be childlike.