>>512070296
my man, that is *not* the lore of vatnik
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vatnik
>conceived and spread by Anton CHADNYIK
lmao
Ukrochud gigachad vs virgin pozzian mongol slave
>>512071794
No need to be so angry about it lol
Just laugh with him instead of about him, I don't think he's being disingenuous and the term "vatnik" is pretty specific still
(But gaining traction)
....
Okay, he's being silly and retarded, I take back what I said to Ukroanon, he was right to be a little rude and derisive.