Search results for "9b60c58ed78afbfccd3df26eec5bbed8" in md5 (3)

/r9k/ - Thread 82405269
Anonymous No.82409875
>>82409844
-COURSE they are going to make a shift. It's not even a question of the views held by the government, it's just them coming up against the walls and saying "oh shit, we can't go further here we should do something else", that's it. Once again, IT'S A MANAGERIAL PROBLEM.

Pro-whitism is not genocidal, pro-family is not genocidal, pro-natal is not genocidal. It's kind of hilarious such things would ever cease to be innocuous, but that's what 70+ years of propaganda will do to a population. It takes a long time for social experiements to come to fruition, and we are right now living in a case study.
/r9k/ - black anon here, I dont get it, am I autistic?
Anonymous No.82186323
>>82186180
and also if it wasn't clear, I'm not saying the ad is "white supremacist", I'm saying they identified it as such. It's basically selection bias for them and it's a byproduct of propagandization. If it's white, and it's good, it stands out to them, and suddenly they start thinking symbolically, but if it's obese black women or whatever other thing they are totally nihilistic, they won't identify anything wrong with it.
The cause of the propagandization is a whole can of worms too, it would be hard to thouroughly go over that but it has to do with post WW2 consensus and years of blatant anti-whitism.

It's unfortunately the sort of thing which, when you speak of it, people probably start to tune out if they don't know the context themselves https://odysee.com/$/embed/@AmalekInternational:6/defiant:a7
It's also easy to overcomplicate.
/pol/ - Thread 510978322
Anonymous United States No.510980867
>>510978322
I want to think there's a way peaceful co-existence can work but I'm not convinced. I think seggregation needs brought back, because race erasure will never happen, and civil war level escalations should be fully allowed under any circumstance in which the seggregated initiates it. Pointless killing would ideally be regarded as grounds for violent escalation.
Afterall whites went through a history of executions and guillotines. Maybe they need the same on a genetic level. I think segregation is the most respectful to the non aggression principle, and I think the opposite in our unjust and propaganda riden society is literal bio-terrorism, because one group is not allowed to think of themselves as a group and therefore has no basis on which to defend itself legally or otherwise thus meaning they (whites) are definitionally marked for genocide. Honestly you'd be retarded to think that groups with vendettas against other groups, which also know how war works, wouldn't know how to fight it indirectly by way of manchurian candidates. That's the most affective kind of war. A longer way of saying "subversion" really. These words get entrenched however and then people don't really know what they mean.

If a random guy on the internet like me can think this up you bet your ass MIC has.

It's obvious who's marked for death, it's not even debatable, that is how that works. Do I know it's a conspiracy? No, but I know that the purpose of a system is what it does.

https://odysee.com/@AmalekInternational:6/defiant:a7

Does anyone even deny it anymore? Not everyone beleives accepts or is aware, but do leftoids pretend anymore?