You mean
>kikeservatives are frantically vacillating between two silly internet culture war identities to scapegoat for their masters' sloppy asset termination op
4chan Search
2 results for "9c55837385938a75b2cb1c70fb244a44"
Millenial Propaganda
I've been reading a lot of blogs written by a lot of different millennials, and noticed that they more-or-less have a '2-2-1' interruptive pattern. What I mean by this, is that they have two long sentences/paragraphs/clauses/etc., and it's followed up by a really short declarative sentence. Something like this. It's very irritating to read, because the flow is so incredibly jarring. You'll have one long word diarrhea to get you up to gear, then another word diarrhea to start cruising. Then you stop.
The pattern is also fractal.
In fact, the interruptives on the larger scale like between paragraphs are the most irritating of them all. This is because they often include some really, smug, pretentious or 'meta' aside; and it's like the millennial writer likes to give it all the attention just to make it even more palpably irritating. I hate it. You've got all these run-on sentences of verbal diarrhea that are purposefully difficult to parse inbetween simpler styles. There's no flow, everything is completely discordant, and it kills your reading comprehension of the entire piece. But then again, you have to think...
Maybe that's the point.
I say that because I've noticed this most often in hit pieces on cultural practices. Blogs copying social articles from The Atlantic do this a lot, and usually with very bitchy and whiny millennial writers. It's propaganda. By using this structure of long strings of hard-to-parse prose followed up by a shorter sentence, there's a kind of mental hijack that happens. The longer sentences become ignored, the shorter inspersed '1' points become all that's remembered, and this mental trick can be utilized to manipulate the reader. Usually for pro-communist causes.
Picrel.
The pattern is also fractal.
In fact, the interruptives on the larger scale like between paragraphs are the most irritating of them all. This is because they often include some really, smug, pretentious or 'meta' aside; and it's like the millennial writer likes to give it all the attention just to make it even more palpably irritating. I hate it. You've got all these run-on sentences of verbal diarrhea that are purposefully difficult to parse inbetween simpler styles. There's no flow, everything is completely discordant, and it kills your reading comprehension of the entire piece. But then again, you have to think...
Maybe that's the point.
I say that because I've noticed this most often in hit pieces on cultural practices. Blogs copying social articles from The Atlantic do this a lot, and usually with very bitchy and whiny millennial writers. It's propaganda. By using this structure of long strings of hard-to-parse prose followed up by a shorter sentence, there's a kind of mental hijack that happens. The longer sentences become ignored, the shorter inspersed '1' points become all that's remembered, and this mental trick can be utilized to manipulate the reader. Usually for pro-communist causes.
Picrel.