Anonymous
8/17/2025, 2:17:45 PM
No.535558739
The funniest thing about all of this is that only two conclusions can be drawn and are hilarious
>High/Max risk cc clears aren't a good metric to decide what op is or isn't good. (Leads to implications that planning rolls around meta tierlists based around cc/is as pointless)
>High/Max risk cc clears are a good metric to decide what op is or isn't good. (Leads to implications that operators like Walter/Logos aren't good because they don't appear in max risk clears. Also admits to bias by not acknowledging units like Magallan/Blaze)
Anonymous
7/18/2025, 11:24:56 AM
No.531704034
>Greeds for extra and loses
>"heckin rng kusomode"
Anonymous
7/13/2025, 11:46:19 PM
No.531110837
>good, we love Priestess
>I love Priestess!
>Priestess is good.