>>521058505
lmao no, read about what this guys defence was. it was a 20 year old accusation based soley on two womens testimonies. thats all they had on him. fucking nothing. they would have to prove he was there, he even met them, AND had sex with them, AND THEN that it was rough or wasnt consented. basically the hardest fucking thing to prove.
what did he do? lmao i wish i could of seen his lawyers faces when he dropped the biggest fucking flub ever, he fucking admitted it. tl;dr he fucking said
>oh yeah. i was there
>that was me
>we had sex
>and it was ROUGH
>but they LIKED IT.
fucking lmao you could just feel his lawyers mentally committing suicide holy shit. now instead of them having to prove ANYTHING that would of been fucking impossible, he reduced it one single thing. "did they like it". WHILE THEY WERE ALIVE, IN THE ROOM AND ABLE TO SAY NO THEY DIDNT LIKE IT.
holy fucking lmao he should fucking sue his lawyers if they suggested to basically confess, but if it was his own idea fucking WEW.
>im sorry your honor, i was literally knee deep in the cocaine, 4 bottles of jack daniels every 6 hours for the entirity of those 5 years. oh and i was on acid and practicing voodoo rituals, so i dont remember anything of the 90's, and i dont recall these people at all
that would of been a better a defence. thats how poor his defense was. he could of said he was mainlining heroin and his memory was foggy and that would of been preferred.
his defense and court case will go down in history and be taught for generations on
>how to fuck up as hard as humanly possible