>>11384632
It's easy enough to spin up clones, and most people just opt for an artificial womb because they can't afford to be pregnant for 9 months, but the ultra-wealthy will frequently flaunt their wealth by buying top quality slaves and then heavily augmenting them to become 'fertility idols.' Bio-modified women who are retooled specifically get get obscenely pregnant very easily. Typically not even with their own children, but as a surrogacy for their master's primary slave-wife. Usually as a reward for ending their tenure these surrogacy slaves (mind you, modern medical science in this setting keeps these women functionally youthful and fertile well into their 70's) these women are allowed to have their own children. By the time it happens these women are either so far gone, so far down the pipe or so degenerate themselves that it doesn't register that their own daughters are going to be raised for this life as well. Either that or they don't care enough to object.

Despite appearances, most of these women successfully buy back the rights to themselves somewhere from their 50's to their 70's and usually leave the profession very well compensated. And they usually retain the rights to their own augments and enhancements- humans usually live to about 150 in this setting so- as far as the propaganda is concerned- none of this is really objectionable.

>Thus in sex and regular work they're used for the things men wouldn't want to use their own slaves for.
Slaves and property would become two distinct terms. Property is made, one has to become a slave. Property has a wide variety of limitations owing to how they're made and how one creates and raises a clone. Clones are raised to follow orders so it is difficult to train them on things that require a degree of critical thinking. Outside of criminals, most slaves are economic slaves. In short, women who sold themselves when they couldn't find work- hard to compete with men in a fair playing field!