>>512283184
>they should be taxed at 40% of their income.
If they are childless and under 30 they shouldn't have an income.

The statistics are undeniable when you dive into it.
Women generally don't date men who earn less than them and prefer to stay single "until the right guy comes along" until they are 40+ and still single waiting for a good looking high earner who wants a now infertile old hag.
Women under 30 should be allowed to work 50% maximum and have limits on the income, if childless and not in a registered partnership for instance then income above 30% of national average gets taxed at an additional 25%.

Men can lower their tax by having a shared family (MF) income where all incomes are pooled and taxed at the average income bracket for the two.
Tax deductions of 10 basis points for each child under 18 (including on payroll tax)

There you have it.
Womens hypergamy is not a problem anymore and everyone has a strong economic incentive to make children.

>>512287268
>Not in globohomo land, they replace us by the millions when it’s peace time even
Exactly.
So 84% of the population, even in anonymous surveys, say that they don't want to fight for their country.
But this also means that 16% will fight for what amounts to an oppressive suicidal anti-natalist regime...
as long as they are allowed to wear a uniform and live the military life.

These 16% btw are the ones who get the tanks, legal training and other weapons to kill or forcefully recruit or subdue the remaining 84% if that need ever arises.