Also, Rurik was a Ukrainian man, not a scandinavian

How do Russians reconcile that Rurik was not a viking warrior who founded Russia but instead a Ukrainian man? This has been conclusively proved by academic research.

>>513220783
Not funny, there is plenty evidence of ancient Ukrainian history that Russians try to destroy or steal. For example it has already been proven that Rurik was a Ukrainian man.

Any way you spin it, Ukrainians were there before Russians. There is a highly respected academic study that determined Rurik the founder of Russia was a Ukraininan man and not from Scandinnavia

New studies have shown conclusively and ABSOLUTELY that Rurik who is known as the founder of Russia and the Rurikid dynasty was not a man from the north or a viking but was actually a Ukrainian man.
Once again, Russians stole Ukrainian history to try and erase Ukraine.

The entire basis of "Russian" history is a lie.
It has been proven that "Rurik" who Russians say is the person that created Russua was not norse or scandinavian but rather a Ukrainian man.

It appears Russians can no longer view Rurik as their ancestor and a lot of history being accepted as Rurik founding Russia is in fact fake, as Rurik has been discovered to have been a Ukrainian man, without Scandinavian blood or origin.
Like usual, Russian appropriated his name and actions to make a fake history for themselves.

Russians love to talk about Rurik and how Russians were founded by Rurik, but research and history proves otherwise - Rurik was in fact Ukrainian.
This is why Russia is destroying Ukraine - they can not afford nor let true history go out!