>>519494361
Meanwhile I'm banned for 'threatening violence" for saying some comic book villain shit like that copper thieves should be dipped in vats of molten copper and their casts displayed to warn others.
4chan Search
3 results for "a0e174ef76ce72e684e0b70dc7a9bdfc"
>>519244355
They're too busy repeatedly banning me for making "threats of violence" for saying things like: "copper thieves should be dipped in vats of molten copper and their casts displayed on bridges as a warning to others". And then affirming their judgments when I "appeal" on the basis that discussing James Bond villlainesque punishments for criminals doesn't constitute a threat given that there is no statement of intent, capability to execute, or individual/group targeted.
They're too busy repeatedly banning me for making "threats of violence" for saying things like: "copper thieves should be dipped in vats of molten copper and their casts displayed on bridges as a warning to others". And then affirming their judgments when I "appeal" on the basis that discussing James Bond villlainesque punishments for criminals doesn't constitute a threat given that there is no statement of intent, capability to execute, or individual/group targeted.
>>518925685
>inb4 reddit
I was banned from reddit for "threats of violence". My threat was suggesting that copper thieves should be dipped in vats of molten copper and their casts displayed on bridges to warn other would-be thieves.
I'm not even sure how that can be considered a threat given how impractical it would be and that there was no statement of intent or capability to enact it, but I'm certain it was an AI that made the judgment.
>inb4 reddit
I was banned from reddit for "threats of violence". My threat was suggesting that copper thieves should be dipped in vats of molten copper and their casts displayed on bridges to warn other would-be thieves.
I'm not even sure how that can be considered a threat given how impractical it would be and that there was no statement of intent or capability to enact it, but I'm certain it was an AI that made the judgment.