Rips apart the notion that 'jew' is a distinct ethnic group with any ties whatsoever to the land of modern day israel. argues that this ethnic concept of 'jew' emerged in the 1800s (for the purpose of stealing the land of israel but i dont recall if the author says that) and is not a historic reality, at all. most (essentially all...) jews have 0 connection to anything in the bible or 1st century history, but rather are later converts who assumed that identity. the khazar conversion is just one small tributary of conversions that took place, and isnt even the most significant. significant conversions of jews imo is from when judea invaded edom in the the 2nd century bc, and onwards in coastal cities all across the mediterranean until the 4th century ad, when rome strongly discouraged conversion to judaism and judaism itself did as well. so jews are a highly mixed people with edomite blood which is ironic since their own religion says edomites are to be slaughtered. but anyway, the tl;dr is that Sand attacks zionist historiography as lying trash and concludes by saying jews are mostly converts which contradicts their anti-religion of judaism.

https://archive.org/details/pdfy-tK1HC34yngmDtslV