5 results for "a17ca4600b15611c6f29160fe58efee3"
>>521342276
Why did congress choose to release the files in PDF format instead of EML format which would have been as easy as "right click --> save as"??? I will tell you why they made this decision.

EML is the format that Wikileaks the famous producer of the Podesta emails, the Clinton Emails, and the DNC leaked emails chose to use.

Why did Wikileaks choose to use this format? Because it is a cross platform format for email files and more importantly this format preserves DKIM in the original header of the email.

Emails have headers with DKIM Signatures signed each way on a chain multiple times over. It is hash of the domain key, and validates the content itself as authentic. All of the DNC leaks, HRC leaks, Podesta leaks all pass this signature check by the way.

Congress PURPOSELY CHOSE not to release the files in EML format because they don't want you to confirm the emails authenticity.
Why don't they want you to confirm the emails authenticity?
Because the emails are most likely forged and fake.

ANYONE CAN VERIFY THE AUTHENTICITY OF THE PODESTA EMAILS WITH THREE SIMPLE COMMANDS.

INSTALL TOOLS:
apt-get install wget opendkim-tools

DOWNLOAD A PODESTA EMAIL TO VERIFY:
wget 'https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails//get/4984'

VERIFY SIGNATURE:
cat 4984 | dkimverify

THIS SHOULD PRODUCE AN "OK" MEANING THAT IT PASSED THE VERIFICATION CHECK

THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE TO DO WITH THE EMAILS RELEASED RECENTLY.
>THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE TO DO WITH THE EMAILS RELEASED RECENTLY.
THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE TO DO WITH THE EMAILS RELEASED RECENTLY.
>>521339960
Why did congress choose to release the files in PDF format instead of EML format which would have been as easy as "right click --> save as"??? I will tell you why they made this decision.

EML is the format that Wikileaks the famous producer of the Podesta emails, the Clinton Emails, and the DNC leaked emails chose to use.

Why did Wikileaks choose to use this format? Because it is a cross platform format for email files and more importantly this format preserves DKIM in the original header of the email.

Emails have headers with DKIM Signatures signed each way on a chain multiple times over. It is hash of the domain key, and validates the content itself as authentic. All of the DNC leaks, HRC leaks, Podesta leaks all pass this signature check by the way.

Congress PURPOSELY CHOSE not to release the files in EML format because they don't want you to confirm the emails authenticity.
Why don't they want you to confirm the emails authenticity?
Because the emails are most likely forged and fake.

ANYONE CAN VERIFY THE AUTHENTICITY OF THE PODESTA EMAILS WITH THREE SIMPLE COMMANDS.

INSTALL TOOLS:
apt-get install wget opendkim-tools

DOWNLOAD A PODESTA EMAIL TO VERIFY:
wget 'https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails//get/4984'

VERIFY SIGNATURE:
cat 4984 | dkimverify

THIS SHOULD PRODUCE AN "OK" MEANING THAT IT PASSED THE VERIFICATION CHECK

THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE TO DO WITH THE EMAILS RELEASED RECENTLY.
>THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE TO DO WITH THE EMAILS RELEASED RECENTLY.
THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE TO DO WITH THE EMAILS RELEASED RECENTLY.
*NEW* EPSTEIN EMAILS ARE FAKE AND GAY AND I CAN PROVE IT!
Why did congress choose to release the files in PDF format instead of EML format which would have been as easy as "right click --> save as"??? I will tell you why they made this decision.

EML is the format that Wikileaks the famous producer of the Podesta emails, the Clinton Emails, and the DNC leaked emails chose to use.

Why did Wikileaks choose to use this format? Because it is a cross platform format for email files and more importantly this format preserves DKIM in the original header of the email.

Emails have headers with DKIM Signatures signed each way on a chain multiple times over. It is hash of the domain key, and validates the content itself as authentic. All of the DNC leaks, HRC leaks, Podesta leaks all pass this signature check by the way.

Congress PURPOSELY CHOSE not to release the files in EML format because they don't want you to confirm the emails authenticity.
Why don't they want you to confirm the emails authenticity?
Because the emails are most likely forged and fake.

ANYONE CAN VERIFY THE AUTHENTICITY OF THE PODESTA EMAILS WITH THREE SIMPLE COMMANDS.

INSTALL TOOLS:
apt-get install wget opendkim-tools

DOWNLOAD A PODESTA EMAIL TO VERIFY:
wget 'https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails//get/4984'

VERIFY SIGNATURE:
cat 4984 | dkimverify

THIS SHOULD PRODUCE AN "OK" MEANING THAT IT PASSED THE VERIFICATION CHECK

THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE TO DO WITH THE EMAILS RELEASED RECENTLY.
>THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE TO DO WITH THE EMAILS RELEASED RECENTLY.
THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE TO DO WITH THE EMAILS RELEASED RECENTLY.
THE *NEW* EPSTEIN FILES ARE FAKE AF AND I CAN PROVE IT!
Why did congress choose to release the files in PDF format instead of EML format which would have been as easy as "right click --> save as"??? I will tell you why they made this decision.

In EML, which is the format that Wikileaks the famous producer of the Podesta emails, the Clinton Emails, and the DNC leaked emails chose to use.

Why did Wikileaks choose to use this format? Because it is a cross platform format for email files and more importantly this format preserves DKIM in the original header of the email.

Emails have headers with DKIM Signatures signed each way on a chain multiple times over. It is hash of the domain key, and validates the content itself as authentic. All of the DNC leaks, HRC leaks, Podesta leaks all pass this signature check by the way.

Congress PURPOSELY CHOSE not to release the files in EML format because they don't want you to confirm the emails authenticity.
Why don't they want you to confirm the emails authenticity?
Because the emails are most likely forged and fake.

ANYONE CAN VERIFY THE AUTHENTICITY OF THE PODESTA EMAILS WITH THREE SIMPLE COMMANDS.

INSTALL TOOLS:
apt-get install wget opendkim-tools

DOWNLOAD A PODESTA EMAIL TO VERIFY:
wget 'https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails//get/4984'

VERIFY SIGNATURE:
cat 4984 | dkimverify

THIS SHOULD PRODUCE AN "OK" MEANING THAT IT PASSED THE VERIFICATION CHECK

THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE TO DO WITH THE EMAILS RELEASED RECENTLY.
>THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE TO DO WITH THE EMAILS RELEASED RECENTLY.
THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE TO DO WITH THE EMAILS RELEASED RECENTLY.
>>521277019
Again, why are you lying? This can be easily verified with a simple google search. Your lies have no power here.
>>521276952
He is lying anyways because Gmail has supported DKIM since 2004 but made it the default in January of 2011.