>>516087737
Yeah the whole "tranny shooter" angle the debate left on before he was shot always stood out to me as pre-planned, too bizzare to be a coincidence, even before the news about the shell casings and tranny gf came out. Like a deliberate psychological tie back to the catholic school shooting a few weeks ago that everybody seemed to forget about.

Speaking of which, was that whole incident just completely memoryholed? There are still some questions about the shooter and the incident left unanswered, and many /pol/ anons quickly noticed how several details, like the messages engraved on the weapons, had classic glowie out-of-touch "how do you do fellow kids" vibes. And yet nobody, not even normies, talked about this event after like a day or two even while the flag was still at half-staff.

It seems to me that the Annunciation shooting was meant to incite violence between the left and right but the general public for one reason or another just couldn't give a shit. Operating under the assumption that it was a bonafide glow-op (happy to be proven wrong), was the tranny shooting considered such a failure in messaging that spooks had to tack it onto the Charlie Kirk event just to properly establish the originally intended media narrative? Because if so I'd shit myself laughing from this hilarious display of sheer incompetence, safe in the knowledge that even intelligence agencies are suffering from jeet-level quality control like everyone else.