>>518917667
>Buildings collapsing don't cause earthquakes in the first place
yes they do
see >>518916388
> If buildings that turn to dust can't cause earthquakes why did the building you're talking about cause a quake that was measured if it was turned to dust?
I didn't there was no P or S wave, just a surface wave, as if a massive weight was removed from the ground, say by being turned to dust.
>Notice how the entire fuselage is still there
no, no it's not.
the entire remnants of the plane could be fit inside a van (because it was transported there in a van).