>>534446973
Not that guy but I don't like that question, it feels very obviously leading. Priestess has her own definition of "survival", which is very probably different from my own. It's important to ask, survival in what sense? Preservation of cultural output? Scientific knowledge? Something else? Naively one would assume "preservation of the living members of that civilisation", but Priestess almost certainly does not hold this view, given she is comfortable with preserving living beings as raw information/simulations in the Assimilated Universe, which she additionally believes is a sort of "life". If our definitions of "survival" don't match, or our underlying assumptions are different, we might "agree", but on further examination we value completely different things, so it doesn't make sense to say we "agree" in any meaningful sense.

>>534342361
Most of the prompts are definitely open to some level of interpretation or debate, but the point in the questions and responses lack of nuance is that Priestess is trying to railroad you into adopting a seemingly indefensible position that relies on obvious logical contradictions.

>>531707387
But she IS your wife, silly.

>>528835976
I dont remember programming her to hit menopause
An eternity of period cramps

I am here as well. Please post Priestess.