>>64230334
Jeez, you guys are dense. I was obviously talking about total war casualties, not about the results of some selected pitched battles. (you may check the "How the War Was Won" by O'Brien for some elaboration of this approach. Named battles mattered little in WW2; the Western Allies were plying completely different game by the rules they enforced on Germans).
Compare the German and British bars on pic rel; that's it.
>bbbut one Tiger Tank could have destroyed 35 Shermans!!!
whatever