>>514206780
imagine

>>513022290
>very stronk signals indeed... LOLOL
Sending the strongest of signals back at them

>>512844683
>2 weeks and hoholinas will surrender
I mean... the numbers are out.

From CIA: https://www.rferl.org/a/ukraine-infantry-crisis-military-army-war/33497989.html
>Early in the war, the balance was radically different. In the lead-up to the full-scale invasion in 2022, Russia's army had about 1 million troops, with some 150,000-190,000 concentrated along Ukraine's borders with Russia and Belarus.
>At the time, Ukraine's military had some 260,000 in active service, but the country mobilized up to 700,000 men by midsummer, handing it a manpower advantage over the invading Russian forces, who had by then been expelled from the Kyiv region. Russia was forced to conduct a "partial mobilization" of about 300,000 reservists to stabilize the front line after yielding thousands of square kilometers of territory in eastern Ukraine.
...
>In 2025 [...] -- with Syrskiy claiming some 640,000 of them were on Ukrainian territory, a figure echoed by Russian President Vladimir Putin.
>While Ukraine's total troop strength is officially over 1 million, the Warsaw-based Centre for Eastern Studies (OSW) says not more than 300,000 of them are deployed on the front lines.

One can draw a line on the whiteboard here.
In 2024 they recruited about 450-500K (or wanted to at least) and since then recruitment has been at 30K per month (so about 240K so far this year).

The burn rate for Ukraine over 2022-2025-08 is (260+700+475+240K recruited - 300K)/42months = 33K/month.
So they will have to recruit 300K new soldiers by march or there will be no frontline soldiers left, in which case there won't be a need for any surrender.

>>512528933
>The US wants hundreds of B-21s. How do you even defeat this?
It's subsonic, large and has an RCS about 5x the size of a Patriot missile.
The Patriot missile can be tracked (and targeted) from hundreds of km away.
The F22 supposedly has a 1000 times smaller RCS than the B-21 (which is the same as the B-2, but made to be more affordable), and the F-22 was regularly tracked by the Su-35s onboard radar at over 100km.

The B-21 can thus be engaged by MiG-31, Su35 and Su57s from +300km provided they have AWACS support and the R37M.
Assuming it flies in perfect conditions for stealth.
Otherwise we are talking max range for whatever missile the Russian has, so +400km.

>>512529287
>Remember the /uhg/ fags unironically believed for two weeks that the Ukrainians fortified a middle of the no where Kursk border town and had been holding off the Russians by killing thousands
Yeah, it's not hard to see where all the mental patients went as mental hospitals closed down in the west.

>>512371521
>I like the use of the word "signals." It sounds so serious.
Sending signals

>>512370602
how they get it so big