>>23469112
>Which one
The one that makes you seeth.
It's really fucking simple to know God is real.

Let’s use some logic:

A1a: we live in a causal universe
A1b: every effect has a cause
A2a: if we follow that chain back far enough we reach “the beginning of our universe”
A2b: If an in-universe cause preceded this, it is not “the beginning of our universe”
Therefore our universe began with an external cause;

B1: premise A1 is foundational to discerning truth through science
B2: premise A2 is a tautology.
Therefore arguing against A requires you to argue against the validity of the foundation of using science to discern knowledge.

Since we have proven logically the necessity of an outside of universe creator/creation force that's the best answer you can expect since we know all empiricism is limited to the natural world. Anything beyond the natural physcial world is literally supernatural and describing it or proving anything about it's nature is impossible by definition.