>>60926819
>So the function you're describing isobviously extremely important, right? Without it, traditional marketscould not move onchain, specifically when it comes to that compliance angle with transfer agents. And if you, itsounds like what you were saying outright, is that Chainlink is the only company currently in the US in theposition to fulfill that function. Is that a somewhat unique situation,where if the SEC is talking to you about this process, right, if they were to do it in the near term, which we'll get tothe timeline, but it sounds like they want to move on this stuff pretty imminently, thatthey would naturally only be able to work with you at this moment, or thatthere wouldn't necessarily be a spectrum of firms that that would be able to provide the same function at the levelof compliance that the US government would need. Is that your understanding of how the playing fieldlooks right now?