>>515084660
> survivors
They 'survived' non-violent sexual encounters, for which they were paid handsomely, and now cry about because they want even more money.
Massie and the other guy worship these 'survivors', with one saying 'they'll bring together the country on fundamental values'. Why should America circle the wagons around a bunch of gold diggers?
The term 'survivor' was cooked up in a feminist propaganda brainstorm session in the 1980s, and implies that
> a) they experienced something at all (the cases are unproven)
> b) they experienced something horrible, equivalent to being bombed (a feminist fiction 99% of the time)
Very few women 'survive' a rape, because most rape isn't even violent or life threatening. Most of the 'survival' is women dealing with their own conflicting feelings. What they struggle to survive is their own conflicted feelings about desiring a violent sociopathic mate, feeling used, and not getting anything (money, status) in return.
This is a logic that men do not understand, and so are continually tricked into believing they're saving women who have 'survived' something horrible.
Just listen to these gold diggers describe their experiences and tell me you're convinced they've survived anything other than completely voluntary prostitution.
One described it as a "dream job". Another said that of course any 16 year old would want to massage a rich guy. None of them describe being raped violently. All of them describe going along with it.
What they are 'surviving' is being let out of the car at 6am after the party was over. What they are 'surviving' is that the gravy train ended. Instead of moving on with their lives, instead of looking back fondly at a wild time in their lives, they build up bitter and shameless resentment which justifies them saying anything and doing anything to get revenge and a pile of money.
