>>514684326
>Why were they going to arrest him again?
To quote the BBC, "reportedly relating to a sex crimes investigation."
AKA we were going to continue fucking with him and weren't expecting to get domed so now we have to come up with some bullshit.
You'll note they're not talking about the "original charges" in follow up articles.
You'd think that would matter.
Anywho here's my contribution to the puddle of piss on those faggot zogbots' graves.