>>76527533
wrt to training to failure instead of doing a standard rep range with linear progression

does it work like this?
>settle on a rep range of 5-8 reps
>pick a weight where you fail at 5
>try to push that to failing at 8
>up the weight

like a standard double progression except you're just using way harder weights?

also do people really train to failure every session on bench/squat/deadlift? deadlift is alright but could be iffy going to failure every time and bench/squat are potentially dangerous (plus a pain in the ass because you either have to take the bar back up off the safeties for bench or up off the safeties/floor for squat)

or when he says failure is it more like "failure" where you "feel" like you cant do one more rep as opposed to literally failing the rep like when you test for a 1/3/5 RM?