>>1958329
>I suspect it's actually because you've consumed so much brainrot that you managed to forget in that short time and replied again. You are an attention seeking furry after all, so you have no standards, and your mental receptors are fried to hell and back. A total hedonist.

So Says (you) the nay-sayer who only replied to half of my message, even though the half you failed to reply to was directed at a different anon.

Surely your trolling is lacking of dedication or any actual entertaining lurid details. We can all see that I have failed to invite anyone to my "server" on the shitcord, therefore by extension, any justification you might think you have for such a groomingly personal implication completely precludes any references I may have actually written, about a /trash/catalog/ sort of topic. After all, cargo sucks and ATLS should come stock with NPC AI "blade" servers/cards/whatever that enable physicalized automatic loading and unloading of ships into elevators or wherever else cargo might ever need to go, factorio/satisfactory/mindustry style.

"Hedonist" is too ancient a word to be using in a thread like this where nobody even pretends to express sadness about the recent murder of charlie kirk by the 3-man team at the Utah speech: the one to ask the tranny question, the one to signal the sniper when Charlie started to reply, and that murderer who hopefully shall be caught alive for once, for proper interrogations as to the identities of his employers.