>>7683598
I wish I had a compelling and strong argument to debunk you, but the fact that risking even 0.001% of it enabling something bad that might happen in reality, is indeed bad and without a proper counter-argument.

But at that point you'd need to cancel all sexual content that risks being harmful to humanity, which isn't realistically possible without killing people, but at that point you've lost all your morals and fall into hypocrisy.

So why should 2d degeneracy be allowed?
Mitigation process:
>we pray that fantasy doesn't enable anyone and remains as such for the majority of problematic individuals, while fueling the ability of unlucky people born which such inclinations to indulge in their delusions in a non-destructive way for society (masturbation)
>we hope that individuals see this act of grace and embrace the good soul of humanity and reinforce the loop until them or their genes grow out of such inclination


So basically, even if the risk exists, as a collective we simply have to embrace the collateral damage and push forward, praying that things will fix themselves in the future with the power of love.

Trying to force thoughts police is just going to backfire for the system in the long run and breed animosity instead of trust.

Demoralizing, yes?